In Knowledge Acquisition
The nature of
this relationship is well expressed in the teaching encounter between the
lecturer and the student, whereby the lecturer delivers some pieces of
information/knowledge in form of lecture to the students. Although this may
take place anywhere, the classroom is its formal place. The lecturer does the
best to give the student the best of knowledge he or she could. In addition to
this, the lecturer provides a note for the students for their consumption
towards proper understanding of what has been learnt, the aim of which is to
increase the students’ knowledge.
Having been
given this lecture note, majority of the students properly document the notes
and heavily rely on them. The students do not go beyond the notes they have at
hand. The only time the students go beyond the notes is when they are carrying
out research of different types and levels. And so, apart from these moments,
the students heavily depend on their notes. To finally show their total
dependence on their lecture notes, that becomes their only source for
preparation of the examination on the course. They engage themselves in their
notes so much to the point of memorizing the information contained in it, all
in a bid to pass examinations.
However, with
this total dependence on the lecture note and sometimes with poor performance
of the students during examinations despite reading and understanding the notes
and with the awareness of the real nature of knowledge, we are forced to say
that the lecture note is very insufficient for the acquisition of knowledge by
the students.
One of the major
reasons why the lecture note is very insufficient for the acquisition of
knowledge by the students is because the note is a limited container of
knowledge. The lecturer may have consulted many books or carried so many
researches before making the note; that does not mean that it is more
comprehensive than those books themselves. Besides, there are some of them who
just download from the Internet. What the lecturer does in his/her note is just
to summarise the books and other materials consulted. And as such, unless the
student gets hold of those books, proper and adequate understanding of what is
in the note cannot be attained. Besides, there are other materials on the
subject-matter which the lecturer could not consult and of which the students
have a better opportunity to get hold of in order to gain more knowledge on the
issue of discussion.
Another reason
why the lecture note is insufficient is its possibility of having false or
wrong information of which the lecturer may be unaware of. There are cases
where the lecturer’s note remains un- updated and given the presence of new
information, the note automatically lacks it. Especially for those proud
lecturers who claim that there works/notes will forever remain relevant despite
future information, they fall in this category of having obsolete knowledge of
which the students in trust swallow hook-line and sinker. It therefore means
that just as the information contained in the note is false, wrong or obsolete,
the knowledge the student will have if he/she holds on to it will definitely
share the same fate.
Furthermore,
another argument for the insufficiency of the lecture note is that the
information contained in it may represent only the personal opinion of the
lecturer on the issues discussed therein. There are some issues that need just an
exposition of the various opinions on them; but when the lecturer takes a stand
on the issues and imprints it in his/her lecture, the whole thing becomes
one-sided. That is, contained in the lecture note is a one-sided knowledge.
This in turn shades and shapes the knowledge the student begets from having and
depending on the note. These and many others prove the insufficiency of the
lecture note in the acquisition of knowledge.
Given the above as
the case, we cannot overlook the reasons why students depend heavily on the
lecture notes. One of them is the unavailability of the materials for the
study. Although most lecturers give out information about the materials for
study, some of them are beyond doubt unavailable. Worst still, there are
lecturers who do not even present or state the materials for the study to the
students. Also, laziness on the part of students to make efforts in this regard
contributes to their total dependence on the lecture note. More significantly
is the situation whereby during examinations the lecturer expects what is in
his/her note if not exactly the same way it was given and without which the
student either fails or performs poorly. These and many other reasons reveal
why the students will not go beyond the lecture note.
From the
foregoing, the issue of the insufficiency of the lecture note in the acquisition
of knowledge puts the student in a dilemma.
The first option is that he/she pursues adequate scholarly work by going
beyond the notes, thereby expanding his/her knowledge and falling into the risk
of poor performance if the more knowledge acquired appears on the answer sheet
during examinations. The second option is that he/she does not go beyond the
note, remains in the world of unlimited knowledge and then performs well in the
examination where copy and paste is
required.
I believe that
the best thing to do as a student is to go beyond the lecture note given, so
that the knowledge of the said issue could be wider. And when it comes to
examinations, the student must know what the lecturer wants and therefore do
just that so that the knowledge of the course which he/she has could be
justified. This is because although examination is not the true test of
knowledge, it remains the only test of knowledge at the moment.
Finally, the
lecture note remains insufficient for the acquisition of wider knowledge and
any student who desires more knowledge should go beyond the lecture note. The
lecture note is just a foundation and not the house or main building. Scholarship
demands so many things more than the lecture notes. The Lecture Note is Very Limited!
Nwanyanwu Chris
No comments:
Post a Comment